An SSD would require much more energy than a traditional hard drive !

Unraveling the age-old debate between solid-state drives (SSDs) and traditional mechanical hard drives (HDDs), a recent study has cast a compelling spotlight on an unexpected facet: the energy efficiency of storage devices. For years, the assumption that SSDs hold the crown for power-saving prowess has been deeply ingrained. However, a groundbreaking revelation from enterprise storage solutions company Scality has disrupted this paradigm, challenging conventional wisdom. This article embarks on a journey into this groundbreaking research, shedding light on findings that prompt a fundamental reassessment of the perennial choice between SSDs' speed and HDDs' purported efficiency.

There's a perennial dilemma between which is best for a computer as a central storage medium : a traditional mechanical hard drive or an SSD hard drive, which is, in principle, similar to a huge USB key drive.

A recent study has challenged the preconceived notion that solid-state hard drives (SSD) are more energy efficient than traditional hard drives (HDD). The age-old debate between the two central storage options for computers is getting a surprising turnaround in light of this new research.

PCIe Hard Drives: Speed vs. Efficiency

PCIe hard drives have made a splash in the laptop and console market, providing unparalleled loading speeds for operating systems and software. However, a recent study by enterprise storage solutions company Scality has shaken established beliefs.

Contrary to popular belief, SSD might not be as energy efficient as their HDD counterparts. Scality has released the findings of its research project, uncovering a startling reality : traditional hard drives could offer 19% to 94% higher power density per drive than SSD, depending on workloads and capacities. some discs.

The study's central graph highlights this unexpected finding, showing that traditional HDD outperform SSD in power efficiency. The misconception that SSD consume less power due to the lack of moving parts is thus challenged. Scality's latest tests show that SSD outperform HDD in terms of performance, but their power consumption remains lower.

These surprising findings could influence how we think about storage options for our computers. Although the speed offered by SSD remains a priority for many users, it is now clear that the power consumption of traditional hard drives is competitive, even superior in some cases. The antagonism between SSD and HDD is thus called into question, paving the way for a re-evaluation of the best option for computer storage systems.